

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences

Clauses

Part of Speech


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners

Direct and Indirect speech


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
The parameters
المؤلف:
Bernd Heine and Tania Kuteva
المصدر:
The Genesis of Grammar
الجزء والصفحة:
P33-C1
2026-02-21
60
The parameters
Grammatical change has been described in terms of a wide variety of different models. In works on grammaticalization, the emphasis has been on two aspects of change. One aspect concerns semantics, in that this process is primarily one that leads from less grammaticalized to more grammatical meanings. The second aspect concerns pragmatics, and in particular the role of the frequency of use and context. In the handbook-like treatments mentioned above, attempts are made to reconcile these two aspects in some way or other. The methodology employed here (see also Heine and Kuteva 2002a, 2005) rests on the assumption that grammaticalization is based on the interaction of pragmatic, semantic, morphosyntactic, and phonetic factors. There is a wide range of criteria that have been proposed (see e.g. Lehmann 1982; Heine, Claudi, and Hünnemeyer 1991; Hopper and Traugott 2003; Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994); in our model it is the four parameters listed in (13). A wide range of alternative criteria have been proposed, such as syntacticization, morphologization, obligatoriWcation,1 subjectification, etc. We argue that they can be accounted for essentially with reference to these four parameters. Henceforth we will rely on these parameters, using them as a tool for identifying and describing instances of grammaticalization.
(13) Parameters of grammaticalization2
a. extension, i.e. the rise of new grammatical meanings when linguistic expressions are extended to new contexts (context-induced reinterpretation)
b. desemanticization (or ‘‘semantic bleaching’’), i.e. loss (or generalization) in meaning content
c. decategorialization, i.e. loss in morphosyntactic properties characteristic of lexical or other less grammaticalized forms
d. erosion (‘‘phonetic reduction’’), i.e. loss in phonetic substance.
Each of these parameters concerns a different aspect of language structure or language use: (13a) is pragmatic in nature, (13b) relates to semantics, (13c) to morphosyntax, and (13d) to phonetics. Except for (13a), these parameters involve a loss in properties. But the process cannot be reduced to one of structural ‘‘degeneration’’; there are also gains. In the same way as linguistic items undergoing grammaticalization lose semantic, morphosyntactic, and phonetic substance, they also gain properties characteristic of their uses in new contexts—to the extent that in some cases their meaning and syntactic functions may show little resemblance to their original use.
The ordering of these parameters reflects the diachronic sequence in which they typically apply: Grammaticalization tends to begin with extension, which triggers desemanticization, and subsequently decategorialization and erosion. Erosion is the last parameter to be involved; as we will see below, erosion is not (or not yet) a relevant parameter.
1 Some students of this paradigm of linguistics argue that obligatorification, whereby the use of linguistic structures becomes increasingly more obligatory in the process of grammaticalization, should be taken as a definitional property of this process. As important as obligatorification is (see Lehmann 1982), it is neither a sine qua non for grammaticalization to take place, nor is it restricted to this process, occurring also in other kinds of linguistic change, such as lexicalization. Within the present framework, obligatorification—as far as it relates to grammaticalization—is a predictable by-product of decategorialization.
2 Our use of the term ‘‘parameter’’ must not be confused with that found in some formal models of linguistics. For an alternative account of grammaticalization within a Chomskyan Minimalist framework, see van Gelderen (2004), where this process is described in terms of economy principles, entailing in particular a syntactic shift from specifier to head, e.g. from main verb to auxiliary, from demonstrative to definite article, etc.
الاكثر قراءة في Grammar
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)