0
EN
1
المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية

Grammar

Tenses

Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous

Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous

Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous

Parts Of Speech

Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns

Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs

Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs

Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective

Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns

Pre Position

Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition

Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions

Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions

Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences

Clauses

Part of Speech

Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners

Direct and Indirect speech

Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics

Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced

Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment

قم بتسجيل الدخول اولاً لكي يتسنى لك الاعجاب والتعليق.

Polysemy and meaning division

المؤلف:  Nick Riemer

المصدر:  Introducing Semantics

الجزء والصفحة:  C5-P160

2026-05-12

180

+

-

20

Polysemy and meaning division

A number of the analyses presented so far in this chapter necessitate the associated claim that the word under analysis is polysemous (Greek ‘many meanings’), i.e. that it possesses several distinct senses (as discussed in 10.3, constructions, as well as words, can be polysemous, but we will not pursue this possibility here). To give just one out of several possible examples, the componential analysis of the English furniture terms in Table 5.1 can only be considered valid if certain additional senses of words like chair are first excluded from consideration. For example, as well as the meaning in which it refers to an item of furniture, chair may also mean ‘professorship’ and ‘head of a committee’, meanings to which features like [+ for sitting on] clearly do not apply. A similar point could be made about the description of the transfer verbs buy and give. These verbs show a constellation of ‘metaphorical’ uses like those in (27) which contradict the feature assignments in Table 5.3, since there is no price involved in (27a), and no change of possession in (27b):

These discrepancies are naturally explained by the contention that chair, buy and give have several distinct polysemous senses, and that the componential analysis does not apply to all of them.

QUESTION Do any other analyses in the preceding parts of this chapter implicitly require the postulation of polysemy? Which?

 This example of the necessity to postulate polysemy is quite typical of semantic analysis. In fact, for many semanticists it is a basic requirement on semantic theory to show how many senses are polysemously associated with a single lexeme: if a lexeme is thought of as the union of a particular phonological form with a particular meaning or meanings, then it is clearly essential for the analysis to specify, for any given word, what it is for a word to have one meaning, and what it is to have several meanings. If a theory of semantics cannot do this, it will be open to the charge that its conception of one of its basic terms is intolerably vague. As Kilgarriff (1993: 379) puts it, ‘without identity conditions for word senses the concept remains hazardously ill-defined’.

But polysemy is not required simply for the purposes of technical linguistic theorizing. The informal description of meaning in ordinary language would also be impossible without the recognition of separate senses within the same word. Consider for example the French noun pièce. This has at least five separate senses, as illustrated in (28):

It would seem impossible to give any accurate definition of pièce that did not separate out these five meanings. This is because any definition which tried to cover all the meanings simultaneously would be excessively broad, and would apply to many referents for which pièce itself is not used. Virtually the only definition that will embrace the notions of a piece, a coin, a document, a play and a room is ‘thing’, but this definition will admit many referents to which pièce itself will not ordinarily apply, such as aircraft, stationery items and meals, to name only three out of the infinite number of possibilities. This excessive breadth disqualifies ‘thing’ as a possible definition of pièce, and imposes its division into a number of different senses, each of which can then receive a separate definition.

لا توجد تعليقات بعد

ما رأيك بالمقال : كن أول من يعلق على هذا المحتوى

اخر الاخبار

اشترك بقناتنا على التلجرام ليصلك كل ما هو جديد