Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Simple
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Passive and Active
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
Assessment
Application and consensus building
المؤلف:
Gipsy Chang & Josephine Csete
المصدر:
Enhancing Teaching and Learning through Assessment
الجزء والصفحة:
P458-C38
2025-08-22
169
Application and consensus building
There are three major characteristics that separate Delphi from other survey methods. First, the panelists involved in the survey are experts in the issue concerned. Second, the responses of the panelists are treated anonymously. In studies of sensitive issues, even the identities of the panelists are kept anonymous from each other. Third, the study is conducted in repeated survey rounds interspersed with controlled opinion feedback (Weaver, 1971; Dalkey & Helmer, 1962).
A panel of experts is selected as the respondent group, based on the areas of expertise required. They are then provided with a questionnaire on a certain subject and are required to give their opinion. Their responses are anonymous except to the moderator. The moderator collects the questionnaires, summarizes the results and then develops a new questionnaire for the respondent group. Before answering the second round of questionnaire, the panelists usually receive a summary of opinions, which they can use to re-evaluate their original answers based upon examination of the group responses. In each succeeding round of questionnaires, the range of responses by the panelists gets smaller and converges toward the "best" response through this consensus process (Taylor & Judd, 1994; Linstone & Turoff, 2002).
It is important to note that consensus, in and of itself, is not the ultimate goal of the Delphi technique. The value of the method is not merely its ability to induce consensus, but also its ability to highlight a diversity of underlying assumptions (Nolan, 1994). This would suggest that in the case of identifying criteria to assess creativity, a Delphi should not only result in an agreed upon set of criteria - but on a set that no single expert would have been able to arrive at individually.
الاكثر قراءة في Teaching Strategies
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
