Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Past Simple
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Passive and Active
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Behaviorist theory
المؤلف:
Sue Soan
المصدر:
Additional Educational Needs
الجزء والصفحة:
P103-C7
2025-04-11
138
Behaviorist theory
Behavioral approaches are undoubtedly the ones that presently underpin class room management strategy and most discipline policies such as ‘assertive discipline’. Wheldall, Watson and Skinner are all behavior theorists (cited in Olsen and Cooper, 2001) who believe the most effective way to help learners with behavior problems is by teaching them new behaviors through the use of rewards and sanctions. Encompassed in the philosophy of this theoretical approach is the reasoning that the most powerful means of shaping behavior is that of rewards and sanctions. Thus, if a school’s behavior policy adopted this theoretical stance, a learner would be rewarded for appropriate behavior and sanctioned for any inappropriate behavior. Decisions about what rewards and sanctions are implemented are most consistently reached through observations, documentation and analysis of the specific behavior in question. It is considered that in this way rewards will shape and reinforce desired behavior, while at the same time making the negative behaviors that receive sanctions less attractive.
Case study
A Year 2 pupil, X, is unable to participate in a whole outside playtime without hitting and hurting his peers. Pupil Xs teacher, TA and SENCO all observe playtime behavior over a twoweek period looking for clues for the change in Xs behavior. Factual information is correlated regarding Xs offences and analyzed as carefully as possible looking at factors such as friendship groups, teachers on playground duty and next lessons. Xs parents are also consulted and agree to support the school by offering rewards at home if the hitting stops at school. A reward program is designed for X, giving extra choosing time if hitting does not occur during three playtimes. If X does hit another child, an outside play session has to be missed. X enjoys the extra choosing time at school and the additional rewards and praise from parents at home and dislikes missing playtimes. Within a matter of weeks the incidents of hitting decrease and eventually disappear. In this instance the behaviorist approach is successful.
Case study
Pupil Y is also a Year 2 student and displays very similar behavior to that of pupil X. The school carries out the same assessment process as they did with Pupil X. It was decided to implement a replica of Xs rewards and sanctions program including the parental support. However, after a period of two weeks no improvement in Ys behavior had been noticed and in fact the majority of the playtimes had been spent inside on his own with an adult supervisor. Y did not respond to or desire extra choosing time and did not seem to wish to please his parents. After another two weeks the program was stopped as it was only managing to isolate Y further from his peers. Other rewards and sanctions were tried by the school within its behavioral approach, but Y did not show any consistent positive behavior change. Another approach needed to be applied to meet Ys needs. In this instance the behavioral approach was not successful.
Undoubtedly educators consider the behaviorist approach to be the most straightforward and effective method for the majority of learners. However, it does not take into consideration the percentage of learners who do not value rewards and sanctions. It is for this group that educators frequently want quick fix strategies, not acknowledging that without understanding why a particular intervention is implemented will quite likely make it ineffectual and inappropriate. Vygotsky, Piaget and Bruner also felt that this ‘behaviorist’ approach was too restrictive and needed to take into consideration the social situation in which the behavior occurred. They also felt that behavior is very dependent on others and on the specific context in which it happens as well as on the self (Olsen and Cooper, 2001).