

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
The role of phases in lexical selection
المؤلف:
Andrew Radford
المصدر:
Minimalist Syntax
الجزء والصفحة:
407-10
2023-02-24
1648
The role of phases in lexical selection
Hitherto, we have assumed that the main motivation for phases is to reduce the complexity of the computational operations which the syntax has to perform by ensuring that probes only have a limited search space within which to locate matching goals – and hence that all syntactic operations are local. However, Chomsky (1998) suggests that phases also have an important role to play in respect of lexical selection. We can illustrate this second role in relation to the following sentence (adapted from Chomsky 1998, p. 17, ex. (7ii)):

Suppose that we have reached the stage of derivation represented informally below:

Since the lexical array for sentence (62) – i.e. the set of items we take out of the lexicon in order to form the sentence – includes expletive there, preference of Merge over Move will mean that we must select there at this point in order to satisfy the [EPP] requirement of [T will], so deriving:

But this in turn means that we have no way of deriving (62), since (62) requires the nominal proofsto become the subject of will at the stage of derivation represented in (63). What are we to do at this point?
Chomsky (1998, pp. 19–20) suggests that the problem can be overcome in the following way. Suppose (as we have done throughout) that the first step in deriving a given expression is to take a set of items out of the lexicon, and that these constitute the lexical array out of which the expression will be composed. But suppose, in addition, that only a specific subarray of the items taken out of the lexicon can be accessed at any phase of derivation: in particular, suppose that the subarray out of which a given phase is built can comprise only a single occurrence of a phase head (e.g. C or a transitive light verb, v∗) – cf. Chomsky’s (1999, p. 9) claim that ‘a subarray contains exactly one C or v∗’. The subarray chosen is then ‘placed in active memory (the “work space”)’ (Chomsky 1998, p. 19). Once a given lexical subarray is exhausted (i.e. all the items it contains have been merged in the relevant structure) and the derivation of the corresponding phase has been completed, the computation then selects another lexical subarray to build the next phase with ... and so on. Returning now to (62) There must be a possibility that proofs will be discovered, let’s suppose that our initial subarray of items comprises the set in (65) below:

Suppose furthermore that we have reached the stage of derivation in (63) above. [T will] has an [EPP] feature requiring it to project a specifier. Preference of Merge over Move will mean that if the lexical subarray contains an expletive, this will be merged in spec-TP. But the subarray in (65) contains no expletive. Hence, the only way of deleting the [EPP] feature of [T will] in (63) is by movement of proofs to spec-TP, deriving:

Merger of the complementizer that with the TP in (66) will in turn derive the CP (67) below:

The bracketed TP will undergo transfer at this point, and the italicized trace of proofs will be deleted from the structure transferred to the phonological component. Since we have now exhausted the lexical subarray in (65) and completed the derivation of the CP phase, the syntactic computation can now access a further subarray. Let’s suppose that this comprises the set below (where ø is a null declarative complementizer):

Successive merger operations introducing possibility, a, be, must, there and ø into the derivation will generate the structure (69) below:

At this point, TP1 will undergo transfer in accordance with (7i), and subsequently CP1 will undergo transfer in accordance with (7ii) – so eventually deriving the structure associated with (62) There must be a possibility that proofs will be discovered.
الاكثر قراءة في Syntax
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)