تاريخ الرياضيات
الاعداد و نظريتها
تاريخ التحليل
تار يخ الجبر
الهندسة و التبلوجي
الرياضيات في الحضارات المختلفة
العربية
اليونانية
البابلية
الصينية
المايا
المصرية
الهندية
الرياضيات المتقطعة
المنطق
اسس الرياضيات
فلسفة الرياضيات
مواضيع عامة في المنطق
الجبر
الجبر الخطي
الجبر المجرد
الجبر البولياني
مواضيع عامة في الجبر
الضبابية
نظرية المجموعات
نظرية الزمر
نظرية الحلقات والحقول
نظرية الاعداد
نظرية الفئات
حساب المتجهات
المتتاليات-المتسلسلات
المصفوفات و نظريتها
المثلثات
الهندسة
الهندسة المستوية
الهندسة غير المستوية
مواضيع عامة في الهندسة
التفاضل و التكامل
المعادلات التفاضلية و التكاملية
معادلات تفاضلية
معادلات تكاملية
مواضيع عامة في المعادلات
التحليل
التحليل العددي
التحليل العقدي
التحليل الدالي
مواضيع عامة في التحليل
التحليل الحقيقي
التبلوجيا
نظرية الالعاب
الاحتمالات و الاحصاء
نظرية التحكم
بحوث العمليات
نظرية الكم
الشفرات
الرياضيات التطبيقية
نظريات ومبرهنات
علماء الرياضيات
500AD
500-1499
1000to1499
1500to1599
1600to1649
1650to1699
1700to1749
1750to1779
1780to1799
1800to1819
1820to1829
1830to1839
1840to1849
1850to1859
1860to1864
1865to1869
1870to1874
1875to1879
1880to1884
1885to1889
1890to1894
1895to1899
1900to1904
1905to1909
1910to1914
1915to1919
1920to1924
1925to1929
1930to1939
1940to the present
علماء الرياضيات
الرياضيات في العلوم الاخرى
بحوث و اطاريح جامعية
هل تعلم
طرائق التدريس
الرياضيات العامة
نظرية البيان
Covering Maps and the Monodromy Theorem-Path Lifting and the Monodromy Theorem
المؤلف:
David R. Wilkins
المصدر:
Algebraic Topology
الجزء والصفحة:
...
21-6-2017
1811
Let p: X˜ → X be a covering map over a topological space X. Let Z be a topological space, and let f:Z → X be a continuous map from Z to X. A continuous map f˜:Z → X˜ is said to be a lift of the map f:Z → X if and only if p ◦f˜ = f. We shall prove various results concerning the existence and uniqueness of such lifts.
Proposition 1.2 Let p: X˜ → X be a covering map, let Z be a connected topological space, and let g:Z → X˜ and h:Z → X˜ be continuous maps.
Suppose that p ◦ g = p ◦ h and that g(z) = h(z) for some z ∈ Z. Then g = h.
Proof Let Z0 = {z ∈ Z : g(z) = h(z)}. Note that Z0 is non-empty, by hypothesis. We show that Z0 is both open and closed in Z.
Let z be a point of Z. There exists an open set U in X containing the point p(g(z)) which is evenly covered by the covering map p. Then p−1 (U) is a disjoint union of open sets, each of which is mapped homeomorphically onto U by the covering map p. One of these open sets contains g(z); let this set be denoted by U˜. Also one of these open sets contains h(z); let this open set be denoted by V˜ . Let Nz = g−1 (U˜) ∩ h−1 (V˜ ). Then Nz is an open set in Z containing z.
Consider the case when z ∈ Z0. Then g(z) = h(z), and therefore V˜ = U˜. It follows from this that both g and h map the open set Nz into U˜. But p ◦ g = p ◦ h, and p|U˜: U˜ → U is a homeomorphism. Therefore g|Nz = h|Nz, and thus Nz ⊂ Z0. We have thus shown that, for each z ∈ Z0, there exists an open set Nz such that z ∈ Nz and Nz ⊂ Z0. We conclude that Z0 is open.
Next consider the case when z ∈ Z Z0. In this case U˜ ∩ V˜ = ∅, since g(z) ≠h(z). But g(Nz) ⊂ U˜ and h(Nz) ⊂ V˜ . Therefore g(z0) ≠h(z0) for all z0 ∈ Nz, and thus Nz ⊂ Z0. We have thus shown that, for each z ∈ Z0, there exists an open set Nz such that z ∈ Nz and Nz ⊂ Z Z0. We conclude that Z Z0 is open.
The subset Z0 of Z is therefore both open and closed. Also Z0 is nonempty by hypothesis. We deduce that Z0 = Z, since Z is connected. Thus g = h, as required.
Lemma 1.3 Let p: X˜ → X be a covering map, let Z be a topological space, let A be a connected subset of Z, and let f:Z → X and g: A → X˜ be continuous maps with the property that p ◦ g = f|A. Suppose that f(Z) ⊂ U, where U is an open subset of X that is evenly covered by the covering map p.
Then there exists a continuous map ˜f:Z → X˜ such that ˜f|A = g and p ◦f˜=f.
Proof The open set U is evenly covered by the covering map p, and therefore p-1 (U) is a disjoint union of open sets, each of which is mapped homeomorphically onto U by the covering map p. One of these open sets contains g(a) for some a ∈ A; let this set be denoted by U˜. Let σ: U → U˜ be the inverse of the homeomorphism p|U˜: U˜ → U, and let f˜= σ ◦ f. Then p ◦f˜ = f.
Also p ◦f˜|A = p ◦ g and f˜(a) = g(a). It follows from Proposition 1.2 that f˜|A = g, since A is connected. Thus f˜:Z → X˜ is the required map.
Theorem 1.4 (Path Lifting Theorem) Let p: X˜ → X be a covering map, let γ: [0, 1] → X be a continuous path in X, and let w be a point of X˜ satisfying p(w) = γ(0). Then there exists a unique continuous path γ˜: [0, 1] → X˜ such that γ˜(0) = w and p ◦ γ˜ = γ.
Proof The map p: X˜ → X is a covering map; therefore there exists an open cover U of X such that each open set U belonging to X is evenly covered by the map p. Now the collection consisting of the preimages γ−1 (U) of the open sets U belonging to U is an open cover of the interval [0, 1]. But [0, 1] is compact, by the Heine-Borel Theorem. It follows from the Lebesgue Lemma that there exists some δ > 0 such that every subinterval of length less than δ is mapped by γ into one of the open sets belonging to U. Partition the interval [0, 1] into subintervals [ti−1, ti], where 0 = t0 < t1 < · · · < tn−1 < tn = 1, and where the length of each subinterval is less than δ. Then each subinterval [ti−1, ti] is mapped by γ into some open set in X that is evenly covered by the map p. It follows from Lemma 1.3 that once γ˜ (ti−1) has been determined, we can extend γ˜ continuously over the ith subinterval [ti−1, ti]. Thus by extending γ˜ successively over [t0, t1], [t1, t2],. . ., [tn−1, tn], we can lift the path γ: [0, 1] → X to a path γ˜: [0, 1] → X˜ starting at w. The uniqueness of γ˜ follows from Proposition 1.2.
Theorem 1.5 (The Monodromy Theorem) Let p: X˜ → X be a covering map, let H: [0, 1] × [0, 1] → X be a continuous map, and let w be a point of X˜ satisfying p(w) = H(0, 0). Then there exists a unique continuous map H˜ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → X˜ such that H˜ (0, 0) = w and p ◦ H˜ = H.
Proof The unit square [0, 1] × [0, 1] is compact. By applying the Lebesgue Lemma to an open cover of the square by preimages of evenly covered open sets in X (as in the proof of Theorem 1.4), we see that there exists some δ > 0 with the property that any square contained in [0, 1] × [0, 1] whose sides have length less than δ is mapped by H into some open set in X which is evenly covered by the covering map p. It follows from Lemma 1.3 that if the lift H˜ of H has already been determined over a corner, or along one side, or along two adjacent sides of a square whose sides have length less than δ, then H˜ can be extended over the whole of that square. Thus if we subdivide [0, 1] × [0, 1] into squares Sj,k, where
and 1/n < δ, then we can construct a lift H˜ of H by defining H˜ (0, 0) = w, and then successively extending H˜ in turn over each of these smaller squares.
(Indeed the map H˜ can be extended successively over the squares
S1,1, S1,2, . . . , S1,n, S2,1, S2,2, . . . , S2,n, S3,1, . . . , Sn−1,n, . . . , Sn,1, Sn,2, . . . , Sn,n.)
The uniqueness of H˜ follows from Proposition 1.2.
الاكثر قراءة في التبلوجيا
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
