Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Simple
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Passive and Active
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
Assessment
CRITICAL PERIOD
المؤلف:
John Field
المصدر:
Psycholinguistics
الجزء والصفحة:
P79
2025-08-11
90
CRITICAL PERIOD
A period early in life during which a human being is uniquely endowed with the capacity to acquire a first language. Also applied to second language acquisition. Some commentators prefer the term sensitive period, arguing that language can be acquired outside the period, even if less completely.
Lenneberg (1967) concluded from studies of brain lateralisation that there was a period up to puberty during which the configuration of the brain was flexible. If there were damage to the left hemisphere during this period, the language faculty could relocate itself on the right. A parallel was traced between the timing of lateralisation and evidence from language deprivation. Children deprived of language go on to develop full linguistic competence if they are brought into society before the age of about eight or nine; those who are rescued at a later stage may develop an extensive vocabulary but often manifest an incomplete system of syntax. Hence a conclusion that lateralisation was closely associated with the acquisition of a first language and that, if acquisition were to be fully successful, it had to occur during the period of flexibility.
In fact, the evidence is not as clear as was once suggested. Not all children who suffer left-hemisphere damage develop a right-hemi sphere dominance for language; while adults with left-hemisphere damage may sometimes do so. There is evidence shortly after birth that a degree of lateralisation has taken place, and the process may be complete by five years old. Importantly, brain imaging technology has shown us that language is much more widely distributed in the brain than was once thought.
The deprivation evidence is also open to challenge. There is considerable variation in the way deprived children develop, and no evidence of a sharply defined point when language is no longer achievable. Account must also be taken of the background of the cases studied and the extent to which early trauma may have affected the ability to acquire language and to relate to others.
If there is indeed a sensitive period, there are other possible explanations besides the purely neurological one:
An innate Universal Grammar may be available to the infant for only a limited period; or it may be suppressed by the development of adult cognitive capacities more suitable for ‘problem-solving’ but less apt for the acquisition of language.
Maturation may provide for a stage when a successfully internalised set of grammar rules becomes separated from the evidence which gave rise to it.
Modified input (child directed speech) is less likely to be addressed to older children than to infants.
The ‘less is more’ hypothesis suggests that, precisely because an infant is not fully developed cognitively, its limited attention span enables it to focus on discrete aspects of the input.
The notion of a critical period has been extended to second language acquisition and is sometimes cited in support of an early start for foreign language learning. The evidence is complex and mixed. A distinction has to be made between the rate at which a second language is acquired and the final level of competence that is achieved. Contributory factors to be taken into account include: age at which acquisition begins (age of arrival in the case of immigrant learners), length of exposure, type of input (naturalistic, immersion, classroom) and type of motivation.
The acquisition of a second language can be regarded as the acquisition of a range of skills and information types (phonology, lexis, syntax). Different domains may be differently affected by the age at which acquisition begins. Generalising considerably, it would appear that there may be a critical period (up to the age of eight or nine) for the acquisition of a native or near-native accent. Some evidence suggests that adults initially acquire syntax faster than younger learners; but that adolescents score best, both short term and long term, on a wide range of tasks. Early starting age naturally results in longer exposure. To the extent that these factors can be separated, an early start seems to lead to greater accuracy and long exposure to greater communicative competence.
The question remains of why many adults find it difficult to acquire a second language. Explanations include the loss of the universal grammar which triggers first language acquisition; cognitive develop ment which results in a more analytic approach to the language learning task; intervention of the first language in the process; the loss of perceptual sensitivity with the development of categorical perception; the fact that the adult has a fully developed personality expressible through the medium of L1; and again, the hypothesis that the cognitive limitations of the child make it more sensitive to individual features of linguistic input.
See also: Brain lateralisation, Deprivation, ‘Less is more’, Universal Grammar
Further reading: Aitchison (1998); Birdsong (1999); Singleton (1989); Skuse (1993)
الاكثر قراءة في Linguistics fields
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
