Entropy, a Basis for Lambda Repressor Inactivation
المؤلف:
Robert Schleif
المصدر:
Genetics and Molecular Biology
الجزء والصفحة:
2nd Edition , p431-433
2025-07-10
371
The binding of dimeric repressor to operator can be described by a dissociation constant that is related to the change in the free energy via the standard thermodynamic relationship:
where KD is the dissociation constant of the dimer from operator, ∆G is the change in free energy, R is the gas constant, T is the temperature, ∆S is the change in entropy, and ∆H is the change in enthalpy.
It is natural to assume that if monomeric repressor were binding to operator, then roughly half as many contacts would be formed between repressor and DNA and roughly half as many water molecules and ions would be displaced from DNA and the protein as the repressor bound. Therefore we might write for the dissociation constant of the monomer where KM is the dissociation constant for monomer,
or KM = KD 1/2. This is not correct, however. To make this clear, let ∆S be written as the sum of the entropy changes involved with the contacts and displacement of water, ∆Sinteraction dimer plus the change in entropy involved with immobilization and orientation of the dimeric repressor, ∆Sintrinsic dimer:
∆Sdimer = ∆Sinteraction dimer + ∆Sintrinsic dimer.
The same type of equation can be written for the monomer:
∆Smonomer= ∆Sinteraction monomer + ∆Sintrinsic monomer.
Roughly the monomer makes half as many interactions as the dimer and displaces half as many water molecules and ions as it binds. Therefore
∆Sinteraction monomer = ∆Sinteraction dimer/2.
The same is not true of the intrinsic entropies. The entropy change associated with bringing repressor monomer to rest on operator by correctly positioning and orienting it is nearly the same as the change associated with the dimeric repressor. Thus
∆Smonomer ≠ ∆Sdimer/2,
and detailed calculations based on statistical mechanics or experiments show that the inequality can be severe. This is another example of the chelate effect discussed earlier. In other words, a sizable fraction of the total entropy change involved with repressor binding to DNA is associated with its correct positioning. Roughly the same entropy is required to orient a monomer or dimer, but in the case of lambda repressor, the presence of the second subunit of the dimer adds twice as much to the binding energy. Most of this additional energy can go into holding the dimer on the DNA, and hence KD is much less than KM (Fig. 1).
Fig1. Why a dimer can bind much more tightly than a momomer. Almost all the additional ∆H provided by the second monomer’s binding can go into increasing ∆G, whereas for binding of a monomer, almost no ∆G is left over to contribute to binding.
الاكثر قراءة في مواضيع عامة في الاحياء الجزيئي
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
